Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Population genetic consequences of the fragile-X syndrome, based on the X-inactivation imprinting model.

American journal of human genetics - 1 Mar 1990

Sved J A, Laird C D

Abstract excerpt

We have examined the population genetic consequences of the model of Laird (Genetics 117:587-599, 1987) in which the fragile-X syndrome is caused by "imprinting" of a mutant chromosome. The imprinting event in this model results from a block to reactivation of an inactive X chromosome prior to oogenesis. If it is assumed that males carrying the imprinted chromosome never reproduce, the frequencies of females and...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Dosage Compensation, Genetic
Share to Fragile X Syndrome
Share to Gene Frequency

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genotype

Share to Mathematics

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Mutation

Share to Sex Chromosome Aberrations

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 2309697
PMCID: PMC1683633

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Population genetic consequences of the fragile-X syndrome, based on the X-inactivation imprinting model.PMID 2309697Read ↗

Estimating the stability of the proposed imprinted state of the fragile-X mutation when transmitted by females.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Two progenitor cells for human oogonia inferred from pedigree data and the X-inactivation imprinting model of the fragile-X syndrome.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Fragile-X mutation proposed to block complete reactivation in females of an inactive X chromosome.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Notes on the population genetics of fragile X syndrome.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Mutation-selection balance under genomic imprinting at an autosomal locus.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic imprinting leads to less selectively maintained polymorphism on X chromosomes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Failure of imprinting at Igf-2: two models of mutation-selection balance.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Mutation-selection balance at a modifier-of-imprinting locus.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Population models of genomic imprinting. II. Maternal and fertility selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Population-genetic models of sex-limited genomic imprinting.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Why do fragile X carrier frequencies differ between Asian and non-Asian populations?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Population dynamics of a meiotic/mitotic expansion model for the fragile X syndrome.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.