Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Genomic breeding value estimation using genetic markers, inferred ancestral haplotypes, and the genomic relationship matrix.

Journal of dairy science - 1 Sept 2011

de Roos A P W, Schrooten C, Druet T

Abstract excerpt

With the introduction of new single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chips of various densities, more and more genotype data sets will include animals genotyped for only a subset of the SNP. Imputation techniques based on unobserved ancestral haplotypes may be used to infer missing genotypes. These ancestral haplotypes may also be used in the genomic prediction model, instead of using the SNP. This may increase the...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Cattle
Share to Genetic Markers

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genomics

Share to Haplotypes

Share to Linkage Disequilibrium

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Quantitative Trait Loci

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 21854945
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3905

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Genomic breeding value estimation using genetic markers, inferred ancestral haplotypes, and the genomic relationship matrix.PMID 21854945Read ↗

Genomic relationships based on X chromosome markers and accuracy of genomic predictions with and without X chromosome markers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Marker selection and genomic prediction of economically important traits using imputed high-density genotypes for 5 breeds of dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic predictions for yield traits in US Holsteins with unknown parent groups.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Effect of imputing markers from a low-density chip on the reliability of genomic breeding values in Holstein populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Reliability of genomic prediction for German Holsteins using imputed genotypes from low-density chips.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of genomic predictions using medium-density (∼54,000) and high-density (∼777,000) single nucleotide polymorphism marker panels in Nordic Holstein and Red Dairy Cattle populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic predictions based on animal models using genotype imputation on a national scale in Norwegian Red cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Multiple-trait genomic evaluation of linear type traits using genomic and phenotypic data in US Holsteins.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Different methods to calculate genomic predictions--comparisons of BLUP at the single nucleotide polymorphism level (SNP-BLUP), BLUP at the individual level (G-BLUP), and the one-step approach (H-BLUP).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Model comparison on genomic predictions using high-density markers for different groups of bulls in the Nordic Holstein population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic predictions across Nordic Holstein and Nordic Red using the genomic best linear unbiased prediction model with different genomic relationship matrices.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.