Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Model comparison on genomic predictions using high-density markers for different groups of bulls in the Nordic Holstein population.

Journal of dairy science - 1 Jul 2013

Gao H, Su G, Janss L, Zhang Y, Lund M S

Abstract excerpt

This study compared genomic predictions based on imputed high-density markers (~777,000) in the Nordic Holstein population using a genomic BLUP (GBLUP) model, 4 Bayesian exponential power models with different shape parameters (0.3, 0.5, 0.8, and 1.0) for the exponential power distribution, and a Bayesian mixture model (a mixture of 4 normal distributions). Direct genomic values (DGV) were estimated for milk...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Bayes Theorem
Share to Fats
Share to Fertility

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Lactation

Share to Mastitis, Bovine

Share to Milk Proteins

Share to Quantitative Trait, Heritable

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 23660137
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-6406

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Model comparison on genomic predictions using high-density markers for different groups of bulls in the Nordic Holstein population.PMID 23660137Read ↗

Comparison of genomic predictions using medium-density (∼54,000) and high-density (∼777,000) single nucleotide polymorphism marker panels in Nordic Holstein and Red Dairy Cattle populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Preliminary investigation on reliability of genomic estimated breeding values in the Danish Holstein population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The accuracy of Genomic Selection in Norwegian red cattle assessed by cross-validation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Marker selection and genomic prediction of economically important traits using imputed high-density genotypes for 5 breeds of dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genome-enable prediction for health traits using high-density SNP panel in US Holstein cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of genotype imputation on the performance of GBLUP and Bayesian methods for genomic prediction.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Accuracy of genomic prediction for milk production traits in the Chinese Holstein population using a reference population consisting of cows.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Optimizing genomic prediction for Australian Red dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic prediction in French Charolais beef cattle using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism markers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic predictions based on animal models using genotype imputation on a national scale in Norwegian Red cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.