Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparative performances of DNA barcoding across insect orders.

BMC bioinformatics - 27 Apr 2010

Virgilio Massimiliano, Backeljau Thierry, Nevado Bruno, De Meyer Marc

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Previous studies on insect DNA barcoding provide contradictory results and suggest not consistent performances across orders. This work aims at providing a general evaluation of insect DNA barcoding and "mini-barcoding" by performing simulations on a large database of 15,948 DNA barcodes. We compared the proportions of correctly identified queries across a) six insect orders (Coleoptera, Diptera,...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to DNA
Share to Evolution, Molecular
Share to Genetic Variation

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Insecta

Share to Species Specificity

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 20420717
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-206
PMCID: PMC2885370

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparative performances of DNA barcoding across insect orders.PMID 20420717Read ↗

Barcoding beetles: a regional survey of 1872 species reveals high identification success and unusually deep interspecific divergences.Semantic proximity Read ↗

DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success.Semantic proximity Read ↗

DNA barcoding of recently diverged species: relative performance of matching methods.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Barcoding bugs: DNA-based identification of the true bugs (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Computational Evaluation of DNA Metabarcoding for Universal Diagnostics of Invasive Insect PestsSemantic proximity Read ↗

DNA barcodes for Nearctic Auchenorrhyncha (Insecta: Hemiptera).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Developing diagnostic SNP panels for the identification of true fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) within the limits of COI-based species delimitation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

High functionality of DNA barcodes and revealed cases of cryptic diversity in Korean curved-horn moths (Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea).Semantic proximity Read ↗

DNA barcoding of parasites and invertebrate disease vectors: what you don't know can hurt you.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of four DNA fragments (COI, 16S rDNA, ITS2, 12S rDNA) for species identification of the Ixodida (Acari: Ixodida).Semantic proximity Read ↗

DNA barcodes expose unexpected diversity in Canadian mites.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Towards a global barcode library for Lymantria (Lepidoptera: Lymantriinae) tussock moths of biosecurity concern.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.