Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

DNA barcoding of recently diverged species: relative performance of matching methods.

PloS one - 1 Jan 2012

van Velzen Robin, Weitschek Emanuel, Felici Giovanni, Bakker Freek T

Abstract excerpt

Recently diverged species are challenging for identification, yet they are frequently of special interest scientifically as well as from a regulatory perspective. DNA barcoding has proven instrumental in species identification, especially in insects and vertebrates, but for the identification of recently diverged species it has been reported to be problematic in some cases. Problems are mostly due to incomplete...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Computational Biology
Share to Computer Simulation
Share to DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Drosophila

Share to Fabaceae

Share to Mollusca

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Share to Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 22272356
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030490
PMCID: PMC3260286

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

DNA barcoding of recently diverged species: relative performance of matching methods.PMID 22272356Read ↗

DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Identification of Birds through DNA Barcodes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparative performances of DNA barcoding across insect orders.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Exploring Genetic Divergence in a Species-Rich Insect Genus Using 2790 DNA Barcodes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

DNA barcode analysis: a comparison of phylogenetic and statistical classification methods.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The use of mean instead of smallest interspecific distances exaggerates the size of the "barcoding gap" and leads to misidentification.Semantic proximity Read ↗

DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The multiple applications of DNA barcodes in avian evolutionary studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Barcoding beetles: a regional survey of 1872 species reveals high identification success and unusually deep interspecific divergences.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Tightening the requirements for species diagnoses would help integrate DNA-based descriptions in taxonomic practice.Semantic proximity Read ↗

New insights into molecular evolution: prospects from the Barcode of Life Initiative (BOLI).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Reconciliation with non-binary species trees.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.