Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Effects of selection of data on estimates of breeding values by three methods for litter size, backfat, and average daily gain in swine.

Journal of animal science - 1 Jul 1991

Long T E, Johnson R K, Keele J W

Abstract excerpt

Estimated breeding value was calculated based on individual phenotype (SP), an index of individual phenotype and full- and half-sib family averages (SI), or Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP). Traits considered were litter size (LS), backfat (BF), and ADG. Estimated breeding values were calculated using all data and after deletion of the poorest 5, 10, 15, or 20% of the records for BF and ADG, or 4.8, 8, 13,...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Adipose Tissue
Share to Breeding
Share to Litter Size

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Models, Biological

Share to Phenotype

Share to Regression Analysis

Share to Weight Gain

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 1885391
DOI: 10.2527/1991.6972787x

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Effects of selection of data on estimates of breeding values by three methods for litter size, backfat, and average daily gain in swine.PMID 1885391Read ↗

Effect of culling on selection response using phenotypic selection or best linear unbiased prediction of breeding values in small, closed herds of swine.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of genomic preselection on subsequent ssGBLUP evaluation of preselected animals for scarcely recorded feed intake in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Efficiency of an approximate animal model for maternal and direct genetic effects of litter size in swine.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of iterated single-step and Bayesian regressions on genomic evaluations for age at 100 kg in swine.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Selective genotyping and phenotypic data inclusion strategies of crossbred progeny for combined crossbred and purebred selection in swine breeding.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Changes in genetic parameters for fitness and growth traits in pigs under genomic selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Animal model estimation of genetic parameters and response to selection for litter size and weight, growth, and backfat in closed seedstock populations of large white and Landrace swine.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The impact of selective genotyping on the response to selection using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of genomic preselection on subsequent genetic evaluations with ssGBLUP using real data from pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Imputation of non-genotyped F1 dams to improve genetic gain in swine crossbreeding programs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimation of variance components and prediction of breeding values based on group records from varying group sizes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of three models to estimate breeding values for percentage of loin intramuscular fat in Duroc swine.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.