Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of iterated single-step and Bayesian regressions on genomic evaluations for age at 100 kg in swine.

Journal of animal science - 1 Oct 2015

Freitas M S, Freitas L S, Weber T, Yamaki M, Cantão M E, Peixoto J O, Ledur M C

Abstract excerpt

The effects of modified single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) iterations on GEBV and SNP were investigated using 85,388 age at 100 kg phenotypes from the BRF SA breeding program Landrace pure line animals, off-tested between 2002 and 2013. Pedigree data comprised animals born between 1999 and 2013. A total of 1,068 animals were assigned to the training population, in which all of them had...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Aging
Share to Bayes Theorem
Share to Body Weight

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Breeding

Share to Genome

Share to Genomics

Share to Models, Genetic

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 26523560
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-8842

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of iterated single-step and Bayesian regressions on genomic evaluations for age at 100 kg in swine.PMID 26523560Read ↗

Single-Step Genomic Evaluations from Theory to Practice: Using SNP Chips and Sequence Data in BLUPF90.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Technical note: Impact of pedigree depth on convergence of single-step genomic BLUP in a purebred swine population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The prediction accuracies of linear-type traits in Czech Holstein cattle when using ssGBLUP or wssGBLUP.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Indirect predictions with a large number of genotyped animals using the algorithm for proven and young.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Application of multivariate single-step SNP best linear unbiased predictor model and revised SNP list for genomic evaluation of dairy cattle in Australia.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Improving genetic evaluation of litter size and piglet mortality for both genotyped and nongenotyped individuals using a single-step method.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Detecting effective starting point of genomic selection by divergent trends from best linear unbiased prediction and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in pigs, beef cattle, and broilers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Experiences with a single-step genome evaluation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Core-dependent changes in genomic predictions using the Algorithm for Proven and Young in single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Single-Step Genomic Predictions for Growth and Carcass Traits in Nordic Charolais and Hereford Cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor to enhance the mitigation of seasonal losses due to heat stress in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.