Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Imputation of non-genotyped F1 dams to improve genetic gain in swine crossbreeding programs.

Journal of animal science - 1 May 2022

See Garrett M, Fix Justin S, Schwab Clint R, Spangler Matthew L

Abstract excerpt

This study investigated using imputed genotypes from non-genotyped animals which were not in the pedigree for the purpose of genetic selection and improving genetic gain for economically relevant traits. Simulations were used to mimic a 3-breed crossbreeding system that resembled a modern swine breeding scheme. The simulation consisted of three purebred (PB) breeds A, B, and C each with 25 and 425 mating males...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Genotype
Share to Hybridization, Genetic
Share to Models, Genetic

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Pedigree

Share to Phenotype

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Share to Quantitative Trait Loci

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 35451025
DOI: 10.1093/jas/skac148
PMCID: PMC9126202

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Imputation of non-genotyped F1 dams to improve genetic gain in swine crossbreeding programs.PMID 35451025Read ↗

Practical implementation of cost-effective genomic selection in commercial pig breeding using imputation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Selective genotyping and phenotypic data inclusion strategies of crossbred progeny for combined crossbred and purebred selection in swine breeding.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of the choice of animals for re-sequencing in two maternal pig lines.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of inclusion rates of crossbred phenotypes and genotypes in nucleus selection programs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Imputation of genotypes in Danish purebred and two-way crossbred pigs using low-density panels.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Changes in genetic parameters for fitness and growth traits in pigs under genomic selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Validation with single-step SNPBLUP shows that evaluations can continue using a single mean of genotyped individuals, even with multiple breeds.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Bias in variance component estimation in swine crossbreeding schemes using selective genotyping and phenotyping strategies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Crossbreed evaluations in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor using adjusted realized relationship matrices.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Accuracy of estimation of genomic breeding values in pigs using low-density genotypes and imputation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The impact of multi-generational genotype imputation strategies on imputation accuracy and subsequent genomic predictions.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.