Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

The impact of selective genotyping on the response to selection using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.

Journal of animal science - 21 Nov 2018

Howard Jeremy T, Rathje Tom A, Bruns Caitlyn E, Wilson-Wells Danielle F, Kachman Stephen D, Spangler Matthew L

Abstract excerpt

Across the majority livestock species, routinely collected genomic and pedigree information has been incorporated into evaluations using single-step methods. As a result, strategies that reduce genotyping costs without reducing the response to selection are important as they could have substantial economic impacts on breeding programs. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to investigate the impact of...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breeding
Share to Cattle

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Computer Simulation

Share to Genome

Share to Genomics

Share to Genotyping Techniques

Share to Linear Models

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 30107560
DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky330
PMCID: PMC6247857

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

The impact of selective genotyping on the response to selection using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.PMID 30107560Read ↗

Effect of genotyping strategies on the sustained benefit of single-step genomic BLUP over multiple generations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic selection and its importance in animal breeding and genetic improvement revolution: A comprehensive reviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

Detecting effective starting point of genomic selection by divergent trends from best linear unbiased prediction and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in pigs, beef cattle, and broilers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Hot topic: Use of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) with a large number of genotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Investigating the impact of preselection on subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluation of preselected animals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Avoiding preselection bias in subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluations of genomically preselected animals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Bias in genomic predictions for populations under selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of selective genotyping strategies for prediction of breeding values in a population undergoing selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Selective genotyping and phenotypic data inclusion strategies of crossbred progeny for combined crossbred and purebred selection in swine breeding.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Across-family marker-assisted selection using selective genotyping strategies in dairy cattle breeding schemes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Experiences with a single-step genome evaluation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of genomic preselection on subsequent genetic evaluations with ssGBLUP using real data from pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.