Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of Two PCR-Based Human Papillomavirus Genotyping Methods

20 Aug 2008

Abstract excerpt

We compared two consensus primer PCR human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping methods for the detection of individual HPV genotypes and carcinogenic HPV genotypes as a group, using a stratified sample of enrollment cervical specimens from sexually active women participating in the NCI/Costa Rica HPV16/18 Vaccine Efficacy Trial. For the SPF(10) method, DNA was extracted from 0.1% of the cervical specimen by using a...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Share to Hepatitis B Virus Studies
Share to Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 18716224
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00620-08

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of Two PCR-Based Human Papillomavirus Genotyping MethodsPMID 18716224Read ↗

Comparison of the SPF10-LiPA system to the Hybrid Capture 2 Assay for detection of carcinogenic human papillomavirus genotypes among 5,683 young women in Guanacaste, Costa Rica.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of human papillomavirus genotyping using commercial assays based on PCR and reverse hybridization methods.Semantic proximity Read ↗

HPV genotypes in high grade cervical lesions and invasive cervical carcinoma as detected by two commercial DNA assays, North Carolina, 2001-2006.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Study comparing human papillomavirus (HPV) real-time multiplex PCR and Hybrid Capture II INNO-LiPA v2 HPV genotyping PCR assays.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of the performance of different HPV genotyping methods for detecting genital HPV types.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Human papillomavirus genotype specificity of hybrid capture 2.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of the SPF10-INNO LiPA human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping test and the roche linear array HPV genotyping test.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of a Prototype Real-Time PCR Assay for Carcinogenic Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Detection and Simultaneous HPV Genotype 16 (HPV16) and HPV18 GenotypingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of the hybrid capture tube test and PCR for detection of human papillomavirus DNA in cervical specimensSemantic proximity Read ↗

Head-to-head comparison of genotyping of human papillomavirus by GP5+/6+-PCR-based reverse dot blot hybridization assay and SPF10-PCR-based line probe assay.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of the clinical performance of restriction fragment mass polymorphism (RFMP) and Roche linear array HPV test assays for HPV detection and genotyping.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of the cobas Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Test with the Hybrid Capture 2 and Linear Array HPV DNA TestsSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.