Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Chromogenic in situ hybridisation for the assessment of HER2 status in breast cancer: an international validation ring study

8 Oct 2007

Abstract excerpt

INTRODUCTION: Before any new methodology can be introduced into the routine diagnostic setting it must be technically validated against the established standards. To this end, a ring study involving five international pathology laboratories was initiated to validate chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) against fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a test for assessing...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Share to Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Share to HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 17922920
DOI: 10.1186/bcr1776

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Chromogenic in situ hybridisation for the assessment of HER2 status in breast cancer: an international validation ring studyPMID 17922920Read ↗

HER2 Positivity in Breast Carcinoma: A Comparison of Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization With Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Tissue Microarrays, With Targeted Evaluation of Intratumoral Heterogeneity by In Situ HybridizationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR and chromogenic in situ hybridization: precise methods to detect HER-2 status in breast carcinomaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Interlaboratory Comparison of<b><i>HER-2</i></b>Oncogene Amplification as Detected by Chromogenic and Fluorescence<b><i>in situ</i></b>HybridizationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Agreement between chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) and FISH in the determination of HER2 status in breast cancerSemantic proximity Read ↗

Chromogenic In Situ HybridizationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Emerging Technologies for Assessing HER2 AmplificationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of HER2 gene amplification in invasive breast cancer using a dual-color chromogenic in situ hybridization (dual CISH)Semantic proximity Read ↗

Chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) should be an accepted method in the routine diagnostic evaluation of HER2 status in breast cancerSemantic proximity Read ↗

Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) to detect HER2 gene amplification in breast and gastric cancer: Comparison with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)Semantic proximity Read ↗

Long non-coding RNA chromogenic in situ hybridisation signal pattern correlation with breast tumour pathologySemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of different commercial kits for HER2 testing in breast cancer: looking for the accurate cutoff for amplificationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Determination of <i>HER2</i> amplification in primary breast cancer using dual‐colour chromogenic <i>in situ</i> hybridization is comparable to fluorescence <i>in situ</i> hybridization: a European multicentre study involving 168 specimensSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.