Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Experimental and statistical considerations to avoid false conclusions in proteomics studies using differential in-gel electrophoresis.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP - 1 Aug 2007

Karp Natasha A, McCormick Paul S, Russell Matthew R, Lilley Kathryn S

Abstract excerpt

In quantitative proteomics, the false discovery rate (FDR) can be defined as the number of false positives within statistically significant changes in expression. False positives accumulate during the simultaneous testing of expression changes across hundreds or thousands of protein or peptide sp...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Carbocyanines
Share to Data Interpretation, Statistical
Share to Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Fluorescent Dyes

Share to Pectobacterium carotovorum

Share to Period Circadian Proteins

Share to Proteome

Share to Proteomics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 17513293
DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M600274-MCP200

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-17513293-2026-09-02.2. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-02.2.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Experimental and statistical considerations to avoid false conclusions in proteomics studies using differential in-gel electrophoresis.PMID 17513293Read ↗

Design and analysis issues in quantitative proteomics studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Statistical Evaluation of Labeled Comparative Profiling Proteomics Experiments Using Permutation Test.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Gene arrays and proteomics. A primer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Investigating sample pooling strategies for DIGE experiments to address biological variability.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The role of statistical power analysis in quantitative proteomics.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Technical advances in proteomics: new developments in data-independent acquisitionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Inserting Pre-Analytical Chromatographic Priming Runs Significantly Improves Targeted Pathway Proteomics With Sample MultiplexingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Considerations when using the significance analysis of microarrays (SAM) algorithm.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A two-step multiple comparison procedure for a large number of tests and multiple treatments.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Peptide Identification and Quantification by Gas Phase Fractionation Enables Proteomics Without Liquid ChromatographySemantic proximity Read ↗

Systematic variation normalization in microarray data to get gene expression comparison unbiased.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.