Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Genetically engineered underdominance for manipulation of pest populations: a deterministic model.

Genetics - 1 Apr 2006

Magori Krisztian, Gould Fred

Abstract excerpt

We theoretically investigate the potential for introgressing a desired engineered gene into a pest population by linking the desired gene to DNA constructs that exhibit underdominance properties. Our deterministic model includes two independently segregating engineered constructs that both carry a lethal gene, but suppress each other. Only genotypes containing both or neither construct are viable. Both constructs...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Animals, Genetically Modified
Share to Computer Simulation
Share to Genetic Engineering

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Linkage

Share to Genome

Share to Insect Control

Share to Pest Control, Biological

Share to Transgenes

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 16415364
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.051789
PMCID: PMC1456375

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Genetically engineered underdominance for manipulation of pest populations: a deterministic model.PMID 16415364Read ↗

Engineered underdominance allows efficient and economical introgression of traits into pest populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Conditions for success of engineered underdominance gene drive systemsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Confinement of gene drive systems to local populations: a comparative analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A killer-rescue system for self-limiting gene drive of anti-pathogen constructs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Medea selfish genetic elements as tools for altering traits of wild populations: a theoretical analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Gene Drives Across Engineered Fitness Valleys: Modeling a Design to Prevent Drive SpilloverSemantic proximity Read ↗

Integrating gene drives with established pest controls to mitigate spillover riskSemantic proximity Read ↗

Pest control by the release of insects carrying a female-killing allele on multiple loci.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Dynamics of a combined medea-underdominant population transformation systemSemantic proximity Read ↗

Managing insecticide resistance by mass release of engineered insects.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Dynamics of a combined medea-underdominant population transformation systemSemantic proximity Read ↗

Pest control by the introduction of a conditional lethal trait on multiple loci: potential, limitations, and optimal strategies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.