Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

MicroSAGE is highly representative and reproducible but reveals major differences in gene expression among samples obtained from similar tissues.

Genome biology - 1 Jan 2003

Blackshaw Seth, Kuo Winston P, Park Peter J, Tsujikawa Motokazu, Gunnersen Jenny M, Scott Hamish S, Boon Wee-Ming, Tan Seong-Seng, Cepko Constance L

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Serial analysis of gene expression using small amounts of starting material (microSAGE) has not yet been conclusively shown to be representative, reproducible or accurate. RESULTS: We show that microSAGE is highly representative, reproducible and accurate, but that pronounced differences in gene expression are seen between tissue samples taken from different individuals. CONCLUSIONS: MicroSAGE is a...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to 3T3 Cells
Share to Age Factors

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Gene Library

Share to Genes, cdc

Share to Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis

Share to Organ Specificity

Share to Retina

Share to Sex Factors

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 12620102
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-3-r17
PMCID: PMC153457

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

MicroSAGE is highly representative and reproducible but reveals major differences in gene expression among samples obtained from similar tissues.PMID 12620102Read ↗

A guide to translation of research results from model organisms to human.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A compendium of gene expression in normal human tissues.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Extraction-Free Whole Transcriptome Gene Expression Analysis of FFPE Sections and Histology-Directed Subareas of TissueSemantic proximity Read ↗

A tissue multiplexing approach to maximise spatial transcriptomics output from precious pathology specimensSemantic proximity Read ↗

Limited agreement among three global gene expression methods highlights the requirement for non-global validation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Mining the archives: a cross-platform analysis of gene expression profiles in archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissueSemantic proximity Read ↗

The transcriptome in blood: challenges and solutions for robust expression profiling.Semantic proximity Read ↗

RNA-seq reveals more consistent reference genes for gene expression studies in human non-melanoma skin cancersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Experimental reproducibility limits the correlation between mRNA and protein abundances in tumour proteomic profilesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Deciphering the Sex Bias in Housekeeping Gene Expression in Adipose Tissue: a Comprehensive Meta-analysis of Transcriptomic StudiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Single-Cell Isolation and Gene Analysis: Pitfalls and Possibilities.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of Sex Bias in Housekeeping Gene Expression in Adipose Tissue Through the Massive Analysis of Transcriptomics DataSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.