Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Unexpected findings in identifiable stored blood samples after analysis without consent: moral arguments for and against disclosure.

Genetic counseling (Geneva, Switzerland) - 1 Jan 2002

Verweij M F, Hamel B C J

Abstract excerpt

Obtaining informed consent for using blood samples in research is mandatory. However, sometimes no consent is obtained for analysis of identifiable blood samples in a second study. As a result, a moral dilemma raises in case a possibly pathogenic mutation is found. Should the involved person be i...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Blood Donors
Share to Cardiomegaly
Share to Genetic Counseling

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Informed Consent

Share to Mutation

Share to Truth Disclosure

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 12150210

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-12150210-2026-09-02.2. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-02.2.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Unexpected findings in identifiable stored blood samples after analysis without consent: moral arguments for and against disclosure.PMID 12150210Read ↗

Reflecting on Earlier Experiences with Unsolicited Findings: Points to Consider for Next‐Generation Sequencing and Informed Consent in DiagnosticsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Disclosing incidental findings in genetics contexts: a review of the empirical ethical research.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Disclosure/disruption: considering why not to disclose genetic information after death.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Incidental Findings in Genetics Research Using Archived DNASemantic proximity Read ↗

Disclosing individual genetic research results to deceased participants' relatives by means of a qualified disclosure policy.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Relationships matter: ethical considerations for returning results to family members of deceased subjects.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Postmortem disclosure of genetic information to family members: active or passive?Semantic proximity Read ↗

When information can save lives: the duty to warn relatives about sudden cardiac death and environmental risks.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The ethics of contacting family members of a subject in a genetic research study to return results for an autosomal dominant syndrome.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic testing of stored tissue from a deceased person to define a relative's disease risk: Legal and ethical viewpoints.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Problematizing consent: searching genetic genealogy databases for law enforcement purposesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Disclosure of research results in genetic studies of Parkinson's disease caused by LRRK2 mutations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.