Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Re-contact to advise of testing available to detect high risk for carcinoma: response to letters sent to persons initially ascertained for other genetic reasons.

American journal of human genetics - 1 Oct 1997

Swiglo B A, Lebel R R

Abstract excerpt

No abstract is available from the source.

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Disclosure
Share to Family
Share to Genetic Counseling
Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to Incidental Findings

Share to Neoplasms

Share to Prenatal Diagnosis

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 11644970

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Re-contact to advise of testing available to detect high risk for carcinoma: response to letters sent to persons initially ascertained for other genetic reasons.PMID 11644970Read ↗

Patient re-contact after revision of genomic test results: points to consider—a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)Semantic proximity Read ↗

Controversies in communication of genetic screening results for cancer: a report from the American Society of Preventive Oncology's Screening Special Interest Group (ASPO's 33rd Annual Meeting, March 8 to 10, 2009, Tampa, Florida).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Oncogenetic information in the hands of physicians and the preventive options of persons who are not their patients.Semantic proximity Read ↗

What do cancer genetic providers want us to know about variant reclassification and recontact that we are not asking? A thematic analysis of open-ended survey responses.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Not Forgotten: Patient Experiences with Genetic Variant ReclassificationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Characterization of variant reclassification and patient re-contact in a cancer genetics clinic.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic testing for cancer risk: a population survey on attitudes and intention.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Costs and Barriers of Cancer Screening After Positive Genetic Testing: Are Actionable Mutations Becoming "Unactionable"?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Patients' perspectives regarding health professionals contacting their relatives about genetic risk directly (with patient consent).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of questionnaire on cancer family history in identifying patients at increased genetic risk in general practice.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Why Is Cancer Genetic Counseling Underutilized by Women Identified as at Risk for Hereditary Breast Cancer? Patient Perceptions of Barriers Following a Referral LetterSemantic proximity Read ↗

Analysis of patient reports on the referral process to two NSW cancer genetic services.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.