Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Analysis of patient reports on the referral process to two NSW cancer genetic services.

Familial cancer - 1 Sept 2014

Butel-Simoes Grace I, Spigelman Allan D

Abstract excerpt

To evaluate trends and associations surrounding patient referral to cancer genetics services in NSW. The specific aims of the questionnaire used to collect information were to: (1) quantify the types of cancers being referred, (2) identify the source of referral for the patients, (3) categorise the referral as being either sought by the patient or suggested by the doctor, (4) quantify how often family history was...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Adolescent
Share to Aged
Share to Aged, 80 and over

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Neoplasms

Share to New South Wales

Share to Referral and Consultation

Share to Surveys and Questionnaires

Share to Young Adult

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 24648127
DOI: 10.1007/s10689-014-9710-y

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Analysis of patient reports on the referral process to two NSW cancer genetic services.PMID 24648127Read ↗

A Retrospective Exploration of the Impact of the 'Angelina Jolie Effect' on the Single State-Wide Familial Cancer Program in Perth, Western Australia.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Compliance with professional guidelines with reference to familial cancer services.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Breast and ovarian cancer referrals to the ACT Genetic Service: are we meeting guidelines?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimating the referral rate for cancer genetic assessment from a systematic review of the evidence.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Patients' perspectives regarding health professionals contacting their relatives about genetic risk directly (with patient consent).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Health professionals contacting patients' relatives directly about genetic risk (with patient consent): current clinical practice and perspectives.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Changing patterns of referrals and outcomes of genetic participation in gynaecological-oncology multidisciplinary care.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Adherence patterns to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for referral to cancer genetic professionals.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Patterns of referrals to regional clinical genetics services for women potentially at above-population level risk of breast cancerSemantic proximity Read ↗

Why Is Cancer Genetic Counseling Underutilized by Women Identified as at Risk for Hereditary Breast Cancer? Patient Perceptions of Barriers Following a Referral LetterSemantic proximity Read ↗

Co-design of patient information leaflets for germline predisposition to cancer: recommendations for clinical practice from the UK Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG), Cancer Research UK (CRUK) funded CanGene-CanVar Programme and the Association of Genetic Nurse Counsellors (AGNC).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Guidelines for referral to a regional genetics service: GPs respond by referring more appropriate casesSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.