Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of three HCV genotyping assays: a serological method as a reliable and inexpensive alternative to PCR based assays.

Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology - 1 Dec 2001

Schröter M, Zöllner B, Schäfer P, Laufs R, Feucht H H

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Determination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes and subtypes is of rising clinical importance. In times where also an increasing need for cost effectiveness can be observed, the demand for fast and easy performable assays grows. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare different genotyping methods regarding their reliability, practicability, and expense in the daily routine. METHODS: Sera of 39 patients...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Genotype
Share to Hepacivirus

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Hepatitis C, Chronic

Share to Polymerase Chain Reaction

Share to Sensitivity and Specificity

Share to Serologic Tests

Share to Time Factors

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 11595584
DOI: 10.1016/s1386-6532(01)00186-x

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of three HCV genotyping assays: a serological method as a reliable and inexpensive alternative to PCR based assays.PMID 11595584Read ↗

[Comparison of different methods of hepatitis C virus genotyping].Semantic proximity Read ↗

Molecular methods of hepatitis C genotyping.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Diagnostic tests for hepatitis C.Semantic proximity Read ↗

THE NEED FOR HBV GENOTYPING: A COST-EFFICIENT APPROACH.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Development and evaluation of an automated hepatitis C virus NS5B sequence-based subtyping assay.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Hepatitis C virus genotyping methods: evaluation of AmpliSens(®) HCV-1/2/3-FRT compared to sequencing method.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation and comparison of different hepatitis C virus genotyping and serotyping assays.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of a new hepatitis C virus sequencing assay as a routine method for genotyping.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Development of hepatitis C virus genotyping by real-time PCR based on the NS5B region.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Accuracy of a commercially available assay for HCV genotyping and subtyping in the clinical practice.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Direct comparison of hepatitis C virus genotypes tested by INNO-LiPA HCV II and TRUGENE HCV genotyping methods.Semantic proximity Read ↗

TRUGENE sequencing versus INNO-LiPA for sub-genotyping of HCV genotype-4.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.