Back to search

Article

Validity and reliability of AI chatbots on the comparative diagnosis and definitive management of deep caries based on position statements evaluated from post-graduate students and clinicians' perspectives

2026-01-30

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of prominent AI chatbots—ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini—in the comparative diagnosis and definitive management of deep caries, guided by global position statements from endodontic organizations, as assessed by post-graduate students and clinicians.​ Methods: Four AI chatbots (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemin...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
35f58c80-bfc3-5d6a-bd19-a9dbdd8153fd
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-8320702/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Validity and reliability of AI chatbots on the comparative diagnosis and definitive management of deep caries based on position statements evaluated from post-graduate students and clinicians' perspectivesDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8320702/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.