Back to search

Article

Comparing Physicians’ Assessments of Context-specific AI-powered clinical reasoning assistant with General-Purpose AI agent: A Prospective Multi-Site Physician Evaluation of VITA versus ChatGPT in India and Bangladesh

2026-04-30

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background</h4> Healthcare providers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are increasingly relying on Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, yet most available AI assistants are general-purpose systems not designed for the specific clinical, epidemiological, and resource contexts of these settings. There is no evidence, from physicians’ assessments, on whether clinical reasoning support from purpose-built...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
f678b9ac-9cac-5ca1-9d99-ee306abe08bc
DOI
10.64898/2026.04.30.26351194
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Comparing Physicians’ Assessments of Context-specific AI-powered clinical reasoning assistant with General-Purpose AI agent: A Prospective Multi-Site Physician Evaluation of VITA versus ChatGPT in India and BangladeshDOI 10.64898/2026.04.30.26351194
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.