Back to search

Article

P-hacking in clinical trials and how incentives shape the distribution of results across phases<sup>*</sup>

2019-07-12

Abstract excerpt

Clinical research should conform to high standards of ethical and scientific integrity, given that human lives are at stake. However, economic incentives can generate conflicts of interest for investigators, who may be inclined to withhold unfavorable results or even tamper with data in order to achieve desired outcomes. To shed light on the integrity of clinical trial results, this paper systematically analyzes t...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
f65d3b42-a4db-586b-90d2-a73c1b368782
DOI
10.1101/19001495
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
P-hacking in clinical trials and how incentives shape the distribution of results across phases<sup>*</sup>DOI 10.1101/19001495
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.