Article

How do we evaluate others’ memories? A behavioral and natural language processing study

2023-07-02

Abstract excerpt

<p>Humans have the highly adaptive ability to learn from others’ memories. However, because memories are prone to errors, in order for others’ memories to be a valuable source of information, we need to assess their veracity. Previous studies have shown that linguistic information conveyed in self-reported justifications can be used to train a machine-learner to distinguish true from false memories. But do humans...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: ef8ac04d-bc57-544f-be38-100158f4fedf
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/et5gj

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

How do we evaluate others’ memories? A behavioral and natural language processing studyDOI 10.31234/osf.io/et5gjRead

How slopaganda exploits features of human cognitionSemantic proximity Read

The Not So Illusory Truth Effect: A Rational Foundation for Repetition EffectsSemantic proximity Read

A Crucial Source of Psychological Certainty in Human Cognition: The Certainty Signature of Central FormSemantic proximity Read

Implicit person memory: Domain-general and domain-specific processes of learning and changeSemantic proximity Read

A Moral Turing Test to assess How Subjective Belief and Objective Source Affect Detection and Agreement with LLM JudgmentsSemantic proximity Read

Do people use counterexamples or subjective probabilities in uncertain conditional reasoning? Investigating human reasoning with an open response formatSemantic proximity Read

Hallucination or confabulation? A psychological reinterpretation of erroneous outputs in large language modelsSemantic proximity Read