Back to search

Article

Comparing ‘clinical hunch’ against clinical decision support systems (PERC Rule, Wells score, revised Geneva score and YEARS criteria) in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism.

2022-06-27

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p><bold>Background:</bold>Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common and potentially life-threatening condition. Since it is considered a ‘do not miss’ diagnosis, PE tends to be over-investigated beyond the evidence-based clinical decision support systems (CDSS), which in turn subjects patients to unnecessary radiation and contrast agent exposure with no apparent benefits in terms of outcome.The...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
ef76fef9-c01e-5b66-b376-7f99bc02a572
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-1668229/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Comparing ‘clinical hunch’ against clinical decision support systems (PERC Rule, Wells score, revised Geneva score and YEARS criteria) in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism.DOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1668229/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.