Back to search

Article

Comparative Analysis of the Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection on the Performance of Clinical Decision‐Making Algorithms for Pulmonary Embolism

2024-10-18

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background: </h4> /Objectives: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Wells and Geneva scores, used with a 500 ng/mL D-dimer cutoff, along with the age-adjusted D-dimer (AADD), YEARS, and PEGeD algorithms in patients with and without COVID-19. The performance of various D-dimer thresholds was also evaluated. <h4>Methods:</h4> This retrospective study included patients who presented to the e...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
93ce58f8-79da-5605-b20a-ce140370f1ca
DOI
10.20944/preprints202410.1514.v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Comparative Analysis of the Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection on the Performance of Clinical Decision‐Making Algorithms for Pulmonary EmbolismDOI 10.20944/preprints202410.1514.v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.