Back to search

Article

Comparison of algorithm-based versus single-item diagnostic measures of anxiety and depression disorders in the GLAD and COPING cohorts

2021-01-08

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background</h4> Understanding and improving outcomes for people with anxiety or depression often requires large studies. To increase participation and reduce costs, such research is typically unable to utilise “gold-standard” methods to ascertain diagnoses, instead relying on remote, self-report measures. <h4>Aims</h4> To assess the comparability of remote diagnostic methods for anxiety and depression disorder...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
e6ce4789-60d9-5849-914f-e10a0bf8f24c
DOI
10.1101/2021.01.08.21249434
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Comparison of algorithm-based versus single-item diagnostic measures of anxiety and depression disorders in the GLAD and COPING cohortsDOI 10.1101/2021.01.08.21249434
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.