Back to search

Article

Character-based Surprisal as a Model of Reading Difficulty in the Presence of Errors

2019-05-17

Abstract excerpt

<p>Intuitively, human readers cope easily with errors in text; typos, misspelling, word substitutions, etc. do not unduly disrupt natural reading. Previous work indicates that letter transpositions result in increased reading times, but it is unclear if this effect generalizes to more natural errors. In this paper, we report an eye-tracking study that compares two error types (letter transpositions and naturally o...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
dacf2533-47fb-5c80-869a-dfbe283168be
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/zcwgn
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Character-based Surprisal as a Model of Reading Difficulty in the Presence of ErrorsDOI 10.31234/osf.io/zcwgn
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.