Article

Differences and Ratios in a Nonsymbolic ‘Artificial Algebra’: Effects of Extended Training

2020-05-27

Abstract excerpt

<p>Grace et al. (2018) showed that humans could estimate ratios and differences of stimulus magnitudes by feedback and without explicit instruction in a nonsymbolic ‘artificial algebra’ task, but that responding depended on both operations even though only one was trained. Here we asked whether control by the trained operation would increase over several sessions, that is, if perceptual learning would occur. Obser...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: d703b614-8026-539b-acb9-c4a54988c913
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/6u3cm

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Differences and Ratios in a Nonsymbolic ‘Artificial Algebra’: Effects of Extended TrainingDOI 10.31234/osf.io/6u3cmRead

Numerical symbols as explanations of human perceptual experienceSemantic proximity Read

The Art of Making Problems Simple: A Theory of IntelligenceSemantic proximity Read

The Art of Making Problems Simple: A Theory of IntelligenceSemantic proximity Read

Neural state space alignment for magnitude generalisation in humans and recurrent networksSemantic proximity Read

Ongoing dynamic calibration produces unstable number estimatesSemantic proximity Read

Estimation as analogy-making: Evidence that preschoolers’ analogical reasoning ability predicts their numerical estimationSemantic proximity Read

Generalizing Functions in Sparse DomainsSemantic proximity Read

Theory and measurement: Why representation is not enoughSemantic proximity Read

A Theory of Perceptual Number EncodingSemantic proximity Read

Comparative judgements and higher cognitive processes in human numerosity estimationSemantic proximity Read

Compositionality Under Time PressureSemantic proximity Read

Apshvalka_ind_diffs_preprintSemantic proximity Read