Back to search

Article

Comparison of Efficacy and safety of Tinapeg® vs. Neulastim® to prevent chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in breast cancer patients: randomized, parallel, equivalence, multicentric and Phase III clinical trial study

2023-10-28

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Background: </h4> This study investigated the efficacy and safety of Pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG‐rhGCSF) manufactured by Arya Tina gene company in the preventing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in breast cancer patients. <h4>Methods: </h4> This study was designed as a parallel, randomized, double- blind, multicenter, and Phase III clinical trial. In this way, patien...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
c93087e5-9b00-558d-9e5a-0844f2909d95
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-3404965/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Comparison of Efficacy and safety of Tinapeg® vs. Neulastim® to prevent chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in breast cancer patients: randomized, parallel, equivalence, multicentric and Phase III clinical trial studyDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3404965/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.