Back to search

Article

Citation metrics and quality of the top cited systematic reviews in dentistry: a meta-research

2024-02-22

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Objective: </h4> This study evaluated the methodological quality and risk of bias of the most cited systematic reviews in dentistry. <h4>Methods: </h4>: An electronic search was performed in Scopus database to select the 50 most cited systematic reviews, including any type of study design as primary studies, with outcomes in dental sciences. Two reviewers independently selected the studies and extracted the d...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
b3c3410f-8d1c-5933-b518-36bf51f16f7f
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-3951227/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Citation metrics and quality of the top cited systematic reviews in dentistry: a meta-researchDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3951227/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.