Back to search

Article

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Myasthenia Gravis Treatments: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

2025-12-05

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Structured Abstract</h4> Importance: Many novel targeted therapies have shown promise in treating generalized myasthenia gravis (MG); however, no head-to-head prospective studies have compared efficacy and safety between one another, nor to existing therapies. <h4>Objective: </h4> We conducted a nuanced comparative analysis of MG treatments that accounts for differences in trial designs and populations. Dat...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
a376cb15-6350-5aa4-846d-750329ca61ab
DOI
10.64898/2025.12.04.25341653
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Myasthenia Gravis Treatments: A Bayesian Network Meta-AnalysisDOI 10.64898/2025.12.04.25341653
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.