Back to search

Article

Using implementation science to close the gap between the optimal and typical practice of quantitative methods in clinical science

2018-08-14

Abstract excerpt

<p>Quantitative methods remain the fundamental approach to knowledge generation and hypothesis testing, but in approaches to data analysis there is substantial evidence of a gap between what is optimal and what is typical. It is clear that diffusion and dissemination alone are not maximally effective at improving data analytic practices in clinical psychological science. Amid declines in quantitative psychology tr...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
a333dbdc-6724-5e6f-b4b0-352890296d16
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/n2v68
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Using implementation science to close the gap between the optimal and typical practice of quantitative methods in clinical scienceDOI 10.31234/osf.io/n2v68
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.