Back to search

Article

Systematic and Random Sources of Variability in Perceptual Decision-Making: Comment on Ratcliff, Voskuilen, and McKoon (2018)

2019-06-17

Abstract excerpt

<p>A key assumption of models of human cognition is that there is variability in information processing. Evidence accumulation models (EAMs) commonly assume two broad variabilities in information processing: within-trial variability, which is thought to reflect moment-to-moment fluctuations in perceptual processes, and between-trial variability, which is thought to reflect variability in slower-changing processes...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
9b313b3d-f8a7-5479-bff8-4d2169816d88
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/j98qd
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Systematic and Random Sources of Variability in Perceptual Decision-Making: Comment on Ratcliff, Voskuilen, and McKoon (2018)DOI 10.31234/osf.io/j98qd
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.