Back to search

Article

Artificial Intelligence Powered Research Automation (AIPRA) Versus Human Expert: A Two-Arm Ophthalmology Comparative Study

2025-10-29

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Purpose</h4> To compare the quality and efficiency of an AI-powered research automation (AIPRA) workflow with a conventional human-led workflow for producing a full systematic review manuscript on the same question. <h4>Methods</h4> Two independent pipelines (human-led vs. AIPRA) each generated a complete manuscript addressing “What is the role of large language models in glaucoma diagnosis?”. No protocols o...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
9a92ca93-c161-5840-b891-b143044f1230
DOI
10.1101/2025.10.27.25338904
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Artificial Intelligence Powered Research Automation (AIPRA) Versus Human Expert: A Two-Arm Ophthalmology Comparative StudyDOI 10.1101/2025.10.27.25338904
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.