Back to search

Article

Equivalence of saliva RT-qPCR testing to nasal-throat/nasopharyngeal swab testing in the general practitioner’s setting to detect SARS-CoV-2

2021-10-01

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Study design</h4> Saliva has been proposed as valid alternative for nasopharyngeal swab for RT-qPCR detection of SARS-CoV-2. The sensitivity is generally equivalent, and it comes with much less discomfort for the patient. While there is an overall good performance in the literature for adults, there is much less information on the use of saliva in children or in the general practitioner’s setting. <h4>Methods<...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
912ef8d9-d85a-59ac-8b1e-43f2be92f3fe
DOI
10.1101/2021.09.30.21264181
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Equivalence of saliva RT-qPCR testing to nasal-throat/nasopharyngeal swab testing in the general practitioner’s setting to detect SARS-CoV-2DOI 10.1101/2021.09.30.21264181
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.