Back to search

Article

Comparison of statistical methods for the analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), particularly the Short-Form 36 (SF-36), in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using standardised effect size (SES): an empirical analysis

2025-03-27

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Background The Short-Form 36 (SF-36), a widely used patient-reported outcome (PRO), is a questionnaire completed by patients measuring health outcomes in clinical trials. The PRO scores can be discrete, bounded, and skewed. Various statistical methods have been suggested to analyse PRO data, but their results may not be presented on the same scale as the original score, making it diffi...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
8ef2e23a-6450-57d1-be95-b825c31ba23f
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-5882858/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Comparison of statistical methods for the analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), particularly the Short-Form 36 (SF-36), in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using standardised effect size (SES): an empirical analysisDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5882858/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.