Back to search

Article

Exploring the Value of Peer Letters of Recommendation in the Holistic Review of Surgery Residency Applications: A Qualitative Study

2025-03-18

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Objective</h4> Residency applications rely on traditional letters of recommendation ( t LORs) from faculty or mentors to evaluate applicants. However, interpretation of t LORs can be limited by potential biases, overuse of hyperbolic language, and a lack of longitudinal contact. We aimed to assess whether incorporating peer letters of recommendation ( p LORs) would add a complementary perspective to the holist...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
8b1d1a2b-8142-5e80-a673-e0bb33ba7bb7
DOI
10.1101/2025.03.16.25323986
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Exploring the Value of Peer Letters of Recommendation in the Holistic Review of Surgery Residency Applications: A Qualitative StudyDOI 10.1101/2025.03.16.25323986
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.