Back to search

Article

To RAG, or Not to RAG? A Comparative Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation for ICD Coding of German Tumor Diagnoses

2026-06-03

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Introduction</h4> Coding tumor diagnoses from free-text clinical documentation currently requires substantial manual effort. Promising approaches for automating this process include large language models (LLMs), embedding models, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). While previous studies often focus on a single method, we directly compare these approaches on a real-world dataset of tumor diagnosis descr...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
88f60866-a098-5104-b828-a475b56e2812
DOI
10.64898/2026.05.27.26353695
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
To RAG, or Not to RAG? A Comparative Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation for ICD Coding of German Tumor DiagnosesDOI 10.64898/2026.05.27.26353695
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.