Back to search

Article

How do People Judge the Immorality of Artificial Intelligence versus Humans Committing Moral Wrongs in Real-World Situations?

2022-02-07

Abstract excerpt

<p>In general, people will judge a morally wrong behavior when perpetrated by an artificial intelligence (AI) as still being wrong. But moral judgements are complex, and therefore we explore how moral judgements made about AIs differ from those made about humans in real- world situations. In contrast to much of the current research on the morality of AIs, we examine real-world encounters where an AI commits a mora...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
7d6ecf18-f839-5ad6-a3e0-38f42438a34b
DOI
10.31234/osf.io/bmq7h
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
How do People Judge the Immorality of Artificial Intelligence versus Humans Committing Moral Wrongs in Real-World Situations?DOI 10.31234/osf.io/bmq7h
Artificial Morality: Differences in Responses to Moral Choices by Human and Artificial AgentsSemantic proximity
Caution with AI deception: AI could serve as the scapegoat of Human!Semantic proximity
Moral Concern for AISemantic proximity
Moral Concern for AISemantic proximity
Attributions toward Artificial Agents in a modified Moral Turing TestSemantic proximity
People Accurately Anticipate the Influence of Human and LLM Moral AdviceSemantic proximity
AI reduces conspiracy beliefs even when presented as a human expertSemantic proximity
Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence system's aptitude to judge morality and competence amidst the rise of chatbotsSemantic proximity
A Moral Turing Test to assess How Subjective Belief and Objective Source Affect Detection and Agreement with LLM JudgmentsSemantic proximity
Dialogues with Large Language Models reduce conspiracy beliefs even when the AI is perceived as humanSemantic proximity
Dialogues with Large Language Models reduce conspiracy beliefs even when the AI is perceived as humanSemantic proximity
How Objective Source and Subjective Belief Shape the Detectability and Acceptability of LLMs’ Moral JudgmentsSemantic proximity
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.