Article

Searching for rewards in graph-structured spaces

2019-08-17

Abstract excerpt

<p>How do people generalize and explore structured spaces? We study human behavior on a multi-armed bandit task, where rewards are influenced by the connectivity structure of a graph. A detailed predictive model comparison shows that a Gaussian Process regression model using a diffusion kernel is able to best describe participant choices, and also predict judgments about expected reward and confidence. This model...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: 7d2af7e8-89c3-5c2a-a99d-853b39f07d95
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/vey38

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Searching for rewards in graph-structured spacesDOI 10.31234/osf.io/vey38Read

Inference and search on graph-structured spacesSemantic proximity Read

Connecting Exploration, Generalization, and Planning in Correlated TreesSemantic proximity Read

Finding structure in multi-armed banditsSemantic proximity Read

Compositional generalization in multi-armed banditsSemantic proximity Read

Generalization guides human exploration in vast decision spacesSemantic proximity Read

Connecting conceptual and spatial search via a model of generalizationSemantic proximity Read

Generalization as diffusion: human function learning on graphsSemantic proximity Read

Towards a unifying theory of generalizationSemantic proximity Read

Humans can navigate complex graph structures acquired during latent learningSemantic proximity Read

On the computational principles underlying human explorationSemantic proximity Read

Learning Structures: Predictive Representations, Replay, and GeneralizationSemantic proximity Read

Building Goal-Directed Cognitive GraphsSemantic proximity Read