Article

Finding structure in multi-armed bandits

2018-10-03

Abstract excerpt

How do humans search for rewards? This question is commonly studied using multi-armed bandit tasks, which require participants to trade off exploration and exploitation. Standard multi-armed bandits assume that each option has an independent reward distribution. However, learning about options independently is unrealistic, since in the real world options often share an underlying structure. We study a class of st...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: 58424937-bf29-5d4c-b952-35788e58ed8e
DOI: 10.1101/432534

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Finding structure in multi-armed banditsDOI 10.1101/432534Read

Compositional generalization in multi-armed banditsSemantic proximity Read

Generalization guides human exploration in vast decision spacesSemantic proximity Read

Inference and search on graph-structured spacesSemantic proximity Read

Connecting Exploration, Generalization, and Planning in Correlated TreesSemantic proximity Read

Searching for rewards in graph-structured spacesSemantic proximity Read

On the computational principles underlying human explorationSemantic proximity Read

Connecting conceptual and spatial search via a model of generalizationSemantic proximity Read

Computational mechanisms underlying latent inverse value updating of unchosen actionsSemantic proximity Read

Computational mechanisms underlying latent inverse value updating of unchosen actionsSemantic proximity Read

Towards a unifying theory of generalizationSemantic proximity Read

Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning in HumansSemantic proximity Read

Predicting human prediction error empowers reward learning task designSemantic proximity Read