Back to search

Article

Similarities and differences in spatial and non-spatial cognitive maps

2020-01-23

Abstract excerpt

Learning and generalization in spatial domains is often thought to rely on a “cognitive map”, representing relationships between spatial locations. Recent research suggests that this same neural machinery is also recruited for reasoning about more abstract, conceptual forms of knowledge. Yet, to what extent do spatial and conceptual reasoning share common computational principles, and what are the implications for...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
67a79952-09d1-5b75-9b6a-4a6eb0a3db67
DOI
10.1101/2020.01.21.914556
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Similarities and differences in spatial and non-spatial cognitive mapsDOI 10.1101/2020.01.21.914556
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.