Article

Drawing Lines: How the Public Defines 'Serious' Genetic Conditions for Reproductive Testing

2026-02-23

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p> Prior normative and empirical research has identified a gap between how patients and the public conceptualise “serious” conditions eligible for preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) and how seriousness is defined. Japan represents a highly restrictive regulatory context shaped by its historical experience with eugenics. Although PGT-M has been available since...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: 6718ccd2-2c5a-537a-b3f0-f66963183e39
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8793263/v1

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Drawing Lines: How the Public Defines 'Serious' Genetic Conditions for Reproductive TestingDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8793263/v1Read

Reevaluating ‘seriousness’ in genetic conditions: balancing clinical criteria and lived experiencesSemantic proximity Read

Defining ethical criteria to guide the expanded use of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS): Lessons about severity from preimplantation genetic testingSemantic proximity Read

Offering preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT‐M) for conditions with reduced penetrance or variants of uncertain significance: Ethical insight from U.S. laboratory genetic counselorsSemantic proximity Read

Evaluating standards for ‘serious’ disease for preimplantation genetic testing: a multi-case study on regulatory frameworks in Japan, the UK, and Western AustraliaSemantic proximity Read

Unpacking the notion of “serious” genetic conditions: towards implementation in reproductive decision-making?Semantic proximity Read

Genetic/Genomic Testing: Defining The Parameters For Ethical, Legal and Social Implications (ELSI)Semantic proximity Read

A Closer Look at the Recommended Criteria for Disclosing Genetic Results: Perspectives of Medical Genetic Specialists, Genomic Researchers, and Institutional Review Board ChairsSemantic proximity Read

Serious genetic disorders: Can or should they be defined?*Semantic proximity Read

Reproductive Choices and Attitudes Toward Preimplantation Genetic Testing Among Individuals with Hereditary Cancer PredispositionSemantic proximity Read

Public Knowledge about Monogenic Diseases and Attitudes Toward Expanded Carrier Screening in ChinaSemantic proximity Read

Knowledge and misconceptions of the French population regarding medical genetics: a survey of 3,000 respondentsSemantic proximity Read

Population-based preconception carrier screening: how potential users from the general population view a test for 50 serious diseasesSemantic proximity Read