Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Reevaluating ‘seriousness’ in genetic conditions: balancing clinical criteria and lived experiences

15 Mar 2025

Abstract excerpt

Kleiderman et al.’s recent review, “Unpacking the Notion of ‘Serious’ Genetic Conditions: Towards Implementation in Reproductive Decision-Making” [ 1 ], offers a valuable framework for understanding the multifaceted concept of seriousness in genetic conditions [ 1 ]. Their framework, which emphasizes the core dimensions and procedural elements of seriousness, provides valuable insights into the Japanese context....

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Share to BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Share to Ethics in Clinical Research

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 40089638
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-025-01829-6

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Reevaluating ‘seriousness’ in genetic conditions: balancing clinical criteria and lived experiencesPMID 40089638Read ↗

Drawing Lines: How the Public Defines 'Serious' Genetic Conditions for Reproductive TestingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Unpacking the notion of “serious” genetic conditions: towards implementation in reproductive decision-making?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluating standards for ‘serious’ disease for preimplantation genetic testing: a multi-case study on regulatory frameworks in Japan, the UK, and Western AustraliaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Serious genetic disorders: Can or should they be defined?*Semantic proximity Read ↗

Defining ethical criteria to guide the expanded use of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS): Lessons about severity from preimplantation genetic testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

A Closer Look at the Recommended Criteria for Disclosing Genetic Results: Perspectives of Medical Genetic Specialists, Genomic Researchers, and Institutional Review Board ChairsSemantic proximity Read ↗

What is a ‘serious’ genetic condition? The perceptions of people living with genetic conditionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Generating a taxonomy for genetic conditions relevant to reproductive planningSemantic proximity Read ↗

Offering preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT‐M) for conditions with reduced penetrance or variants of uncertain significance: Ethical insight from U.S. laboratory genetic counselorsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Predictive genetic testing in minors for adult‐onset genetic diseasesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Beyond severity: utility as a criterion for setting the scope of RGCSSemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical Utility of Expanded Carrier Screening: Reproductive Behaviors of At-Risk CouplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.