Back to search

Article

A Comparison of Methods to Harmonize Cortical Thickness Measurements Across Scanners and Sites

2021-09-24

Abstract excerpt

Results of neuroimaging datasets aggregated from multiple sites may be biased by site- specific profiles in participants’ demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as MRI acquisition protocols and scanning platforms. We compared the impact of four different harmonization methods on results obtained from analyses of cortical thickness data: (1) linear mixed-effects model (LME) that models site-specific rand...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
5d6f5c03-1461-573a-b215-bb2e2737176f
DOI
10.1101/2021.09.22.461242
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
A Comparison of Methods to Harmonize Cortical Thickness Measurements Across Scanners and SitesDOI 10.1101/2021.09.22.461242
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.