Back to search

Article

Ranking-optimized survival models can underperform fixed-horizon clinical prediction

2026-06-16

Abstract excerpt

Machine-learning survival models are increasingly proposed for intensive-care mortality prediction and are usually judged by the concordance index, a ranking metric averaged over follow-up. Yet many bedside decisions require a probability at a specific time, such as 60- or 180-day mortality. We asked whether ranking-optimized models perform competitively at fixed clinical horizons when compared with attending-phys...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
57f988c2-d42c-5615-8b10-1e80df27190c
DOI
10.64898/2026.06.13.26355565
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Ranking-optimized survival models can underperform fixed-horizon clinical predictionDOI 10.64898/2026.06.13.26355565
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.