Back to search

Article

What we know, don’t know, and need to know about patient authorship: a scoping review, evidence gap analysis, and research roadmap  

2026-05-27

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p> <bold>Background</bold> Patient authorship is an innovation, challenging a centuries-old medical publishing model. To guide best practices for patient authorship, a strong evidence base is required. The objectives of this research were to: 1. Identify ‘what we know’ about patient authorship via a scoping review. 2. Describe ‘what we don’t know’ about patient authorship via an evidenc...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
5462624d-1036-5ddc-a772-d4fa713ed71d
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-9699160/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
What we know, don’t know, and need to know about patient authorship: a scoping review, evidence gap analysis, and research roadmapDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9699160/v1
How far can AI help with assessing the trustworthiness of clinical trial publications? Review of concepts, methods, and questions.Semantic proximity
An Author’s Guide to Mastering Research Communication Skills: Introduction of a Medical ManuscriptSemantic proximity
A retrospective analysis of gender parity in scientific authorship in a biomedical research centreSemantic proximity
Systematic post-publication accuracy assessment in medical educational content: development and pilot validation of a five-category taxonomic frameworkSemantic proximity
Female Authorship in KRAS-Targeted Clinical Trials for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Bibliometric Analysis of TrendsSemantic proximity
Exponential Authorship Inflation in Neuroscience and Psychology from the 1950s to the 2020sSemantic proximity
Assessment of the Appropriateness of the i-CONSENT Guideline Recommendations for Improving Understanding of the Informed Consent Process in Clinical StudiesSemantic proximity
HowNotToDoPatientEngagement: The Engaging with Purpose Patient Engagement Framework based on a Twitter Analysis of Community Perspectives on Patient EngagementSemantic proximity
Physicians’ Attitudes towards Secondary Use of Clinical Data for Biomedical Research Purposes in Germany. Results of a Quantitative SurveySemantic proximity
Generative Artificial Intelligence and Responsible Authorship: Scientific, Ethical, and Legal ConsiderationsSemantic proximity
La importancia crítica del consentimiento informado en la práctica médica y la investigación biomédica contemporáneaSemantic proximity
Consent to Recontact for Future Research Using Linked Primary Healthcare Data: Outcomes and General Practice Perceptions from the ATHENA COVID-19 StudySemantic proximity
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.