Back to search

Article

When Robots are Surprising: The Role of Cue Diagnosticity in Judging Robot Competence

2025-03-11

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Previous research showed people’s explicit (vs. implicit) competence impressions were more sensitive to a robot’s single inconsistent (“oddball”) behavior. We report nine pre-registered studies (N = 3,735 online participants) testing the scope and underlying causes of this dissociation. We found that the dissociation (a) generalized to industrial robots, surgical robots, and self-drivin...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
488fa9b4-6f8f-58d9-ab42-1d1ba62e7a80
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-5852068/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
When Robots are Surprising: The Role of Cue Diagnosticity in Judging Robot CompetenceDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5852068/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.