Article

Is ChatGPT smarter than Otolaryngology trainees? A comparison study of board style exam questions

2024-06-18

Abstract excerpt

<h4>Objectives</h4> This study compares the performance of the artificial intelligence (AI) platform Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) to Otolaryngology trainees on board style exam questions. <h4>Methods</h4> We administered a set of 30 Otolaryngology board style questions to medical students (MS) and Otolaryngology residents (OR). 31 MSs and 17 ORs completed the questionnaire. The same test was a...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Genomics and Rare Diseases

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work: 48535215-76b2-5359-b4f4-3bb58a32414d
DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.16.24308998

Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Is ChatGPT smarter than Otolaryngology trainees? A comparison study of board style exam questionsDOI 10.1101/2024.06.16.24308998Read

ChatGPT takes the FCPS exam in Internal MedicineSemantic proximity Read

Performance of OpenAI’s GPT-4 in a mock MRCS Part A ExaminationSemantic proximity Read

ChatGPT versus human in generating medical graduate exam questions – An international prospective studySemantic proximity Read

Evaluation of a Novel Large Language Model (LLM) Powered Chatbot for Oral-Boards ScenariosSemantic proximity Read

Human versus Artificial Intelligence: ChatGPT-4 Outperforming Bing, Bard, ChatGPT-3.5, and Humans in Clinical Chemistry Multiple-Choice QuestionsSemantic proximity Read

Evaluating Capabilities of Large Language Models: Performance of GPT4 on Surgical Knowledge AssessmentsSemantic proximity Read

ChatGPT Goes to Operating Room: Evaluating GPT-4 Performance and Its Potential in Surgical Education and Training in the Era of Large Language ModelsSemantic proximity Read

Performance of ChatGPT 3.5 against clinical dental students in General Surgery General Medicine (GMGS) moduleSemantic proximity Read

Human versus Artificial Intelligence: ChatGPT-4 Outperforming Bing, Bard, ChatGPT-3.5, and Humans in Clinical Chemistry Multiple-Choice QuestionsSemantic proximity Read

Evaluating the Performance of ChatGPT in Ophthalmology: An Analysis of its Successes and ShortcomingsSemantic proximity Read

Comparative Performance of Large Language Model-Based Chatbots, Dental Students, and Postgraduate Specialty Students in Text-Based Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology QuestionsSemantic proximity Read

Strengths and Limitations of Using ChatGPT: A Preliminary Examination of Generative AI in Medical EducationSemantic proximity Read