Back to search

Article

Comparison of the accuracy and reliability of ChatGPT-4o and Gemini in answering HIV-related questions

2025-09-08

Abstract excerpt

<title>Abstract</title> <p>Bacground: This is the first study to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the ChatGPT and Gemini chatbots' on HIV. Methods A total of 156 questions about HIV in 3 different categories (CDC, guideline and social media) were asked to both ChatGPT and Gemini. The chatbots' answers were scored on a scale of 1 to 4 (1 = completely wrong, 4 = completely correct) by two different infecti...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
3af18a90-86fd-55b5-89ae-59fad56c809d
DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-7541042/v1
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Comparison of the accuracy and reliability of ChatGPT-4o and Gemini in answering HIV-related questionsDOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7541042/v1
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.