Back to search

Article

Direct use values and passive use values: implications for conservation of large carnivores

2008-04-01

Abstract excerpt

We made a quantitative analysis of the responses of urban and rural residents in Sweden to arguments supporting and opposing conservation of large carnivores. The most important arguments in favour of conservation were: “I want them [the large carnivores] to exist in Sweden, even if I will never see any of them”, “Sweden should share the responsibility of conserving the large carnivores” and “We owe it [conservati...

Topics

Open a Topic to create a Post that cites this publication.

Identifiers and source

Literature Corpus work
39226e18-b1f7-51ea-a2ce-c1c44a83ca1b
DOI
10.1007/s10531-008-9334-3
Open publication

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest
Interactive article relationship graphSelect a related publication card to move it into the centre and load its closest explainable connections. Solid lines are source-backed structured connections. Dashed lines are semantic discovery signals and are not scientific evidence.
Direct use values and passive use values: implications for conservation of large carnivoresDOI 10.1007/s10531-008-9334-3
Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.